Week 2

Hi All,

This entry is really difficult to write, mainly because I feel as if I should give Luker the benefit of the doubt. Like Kait, I read Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences over the holidays. My first impression of it was as a study designed to recycle earlier research, either for the purpose of CV development or for securing tenure. I found that many of her arguments discouraged students from scholarship and encouraged a kind of journalism. Yes, publishing is good, but scholars should refrain from publishing creative restatements of earlier research. Sure, some scholarship now viewed as timely brings together seemingly unrelated topics to re-present common ideas. But this salsa dancing approach does not negate the value of focused and methodical research (and she hardly touches upon positivist techniques). This being said, I found that she made a few good points, though barely enough to justify a 320-page study. Harvarding books is a great concept, as is her notion of the research nodal point. Also, she described a few subject-specific terms which, to my shame, I didn’t know (e.g., sampling, operationalization, generalization). And I like to think that there is some hidden pearl noticeable upon rereading …

My favourite part of Knight’s study is on page 11. He really nails the right questions for humanities scholars to ask themselves!


2 thoughts on “Week 2

  1. Hi Team Researchophile! Quick question, Josh: Which specific passage are you referring to in Knight? I’m interested in hearing more about why you think humanities scholars would benefit from what he has to say.

  2. Hi Josh,
    I haven’t gotten that far into the Luker reading, so I can’t comment on your assessment of ‘Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences’ but I have read Knight’s chapters.

    The part your referring to, is it at the top of page 11, the three bullet points? If so, I completely agree. I definitely marked and highlighted this section of the chapter knowing it would be very useful to help me start asking the right questions. Particularly the last point, “The literature contains claims that seem to be justified but no-one has established whether the consequences that should follow really do follow” (Knight 11).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s